What work & organisational psychology is really about
One lens across recruiting, sourcing, wellbeing research and feedback design.
Read · 2 minNumbers tell you what is happening. Conversations tell you why. In people research, you almost always need both.
My training in work and organisational psychology covered quantitative and qualitative research methods and statistical analysis. In my current work, applying research to a wellbeing product, I’ve found that the most useful insights come from combining the two.
Quantitative data, such as survey scores, usage patterns or engagement trends, is great at showing scale and change over time. It answers questions like “how many?” and “is this getting better?”. Qualitative data, such as interviews, open comments or observation, is great at explaining meaning. It answers “what does this feel like?” and “what’s behind it?”.
With numbers, the main risk is treating a correlation as a cause, or over-reading small differences. With qualitative work, it’s generalising from the most memorable story. Being honest about the limits of each method, and saying so in the findings, protects decisions from both.
In applied settings, a study is only useful if it leads to a decision. I try to finish every piece of research with a short answer to “so what?”: what we learned, how confident we are and what we’d do next.
The best people research gives you a number you can track and a story you can understand.
One lens across recruiting, sourcing, wellbeing research and feedback design.
Read · 2 minWhat changes when psychological findings have to become something an employee taps on a phone.
Read · 2 minNotes from mapping consultants from infrastructure to software on a short timeline.
Read · 2 min